|
MillyaGuild Leader Wears Business Socks
Joined: 27 Feb 2010 Posts: 1731
|
re: ohemgee.
by Millya on 2011/05/05 13:45
Okay, that is seriously awesome.
|
|
|
re: ohemgee.
by Noodlestein on 2011/05/05 14:21
Really?
Seems odd that they'd do that since it'd make the arguement "Sure, its good for you on your hunter but not only is it good for druids it also changes their model!"
I dont see that happening.
_________________
|
|
TassagerMember Wears Business Socks
Joined: 04 Apr 2011 Posts: 1055
|
re: ohemgee.
by Tassager on 2011/05/05 14:25
Well, clearly, that's Blizz answering the age old question...
Is it a hunter weapon or a druid weapon?
It's clearly for druids... so keep your filthy paws off.
|
|
|
re: ohemgee.
by Noodlestein on 2011/05/05 14:27
Other than Crit/mastery are my top stats.
So clearly Blizz isn't thinking this one through properly. imo if they want it that way they need to make it a Class:druid item.
_________________
|
|
TassagerMember Wears Business Socks
Joined: 04 Apr 2011 Posts: 1055
|
re: ohemgee.
by Tassager on 2011/05/05 14:36
My top stats, too... for both cat and bear.
I'm curious to see where this one goes. If true... holy cow.
I think it's interesting to look at the argument that they made when removing tree form - "players were upset that they work so hard to get all this fancy looking armor, and then never get to see it while in form"... that was a major point they made when they made that change.
Is that argument any different for ferals?
This would be one way to respond to what they admit is a problem without taking away the (basically mandatory) forms for feral, as they did for resto.
|
|
TassagerMember Wears Business Socks
Joined: 04 Apr 2011 Posts: 1055
|
re: ohemgee.
by Tassager on 2011/06/08 17:10
|
|
|